30,000 Japanese Troops Landed on Saipan. 1,000 Chose Surrender…

1,400 miles south of Tokyo, June 1944. 30,000 Japanese soldiers, 3 months of fighting. When it was over, fewer than 1,000 chose to surrender. The rest died on the island, in the  caves, on the cliffs, or in the water. Some by American fire, many by their own hand. Saipan was not simply a battle.

 It was the moment Japan’s military leadership understood the war was lost and chose  not to say so. This is the story of what happened on Saipan, why almost no one surrendered, and what the 1,000 who did told American interrogators that Tokyo never wanted anyone to hear. This is No Man’s Land.

  Hit subscribe and turn on notifications. New documentaries drop every single  week. The Japanese defense of Saipan in June and July of 1944 was different from every previous  Pacific island battle in a way that the men planning and fighting it understood before the first Marine hit the beach. Saipan was not a distant coral atoll whose strategic value was primarily about air range and supply lines.

 It was not a jungle-covered island whose garrison could be isolated and left to wither. Saipan was 1,500 miles from Tokyo. It had a civilian population of approximately 25,000 Japanese and Korean civilians who had been brought to the island as agricultural workers and who were by  June of 1944 thoroughly embedded in the fabric of the garrison’s daily life and completely subject to the authority of the military command.

   And most importantly, Saipan was within B-29 range of the Japanese home islands. When American forces took Saipan,  American bombers could reach Tokyo. The implications of this fact for the Japanese High Command were not ambiguous. Losing Saipan did not mean losing an outpost. It meant losing the air defense buffer that stood between the American bomber force and the cities of Japan.

 The garrison commander, Lieutenant General Yoshitsugu Saito, understood this completely. He had been on the island since before the American landings and had watched the steady degradation of Japanese airpower over the Marianas  in the months before the invasion. He knew that the relief force Japanese planning  had promised was not coming in any form that could change the battle’s outcome.

   He knew that the naval battle fought in June, the Great Marianas Turkey Shoot, had destroyed the  carrier air groups that were supposed to provide air cover for a counteroffensive. He was commanding a garrison on an island that could not be reinforced,  could not be supplied, and could not be relieved against an American landing force of approximately 71,000 men backed by the most powerful naval gunfire support the Pacific war had What he ordered his men to do in this situation 

and why is the thread that runs through every decision made on Saipan from the first day of the American landing to the last. The American assault on Saipan began on June 15th, 1944, with a naval bombardment that the Japanese  defenders had been anticipating for weeks.

 The 2nd and 4th Marine Divisions hit the beaches on the southwest coast of the island simultaneously,  supported by the most concentrated naval gunfire yet employed in a Pacific amphibious operation.    The landing was not unopposed. Japanese defensive preparations on Saipan had been  extensive, with artillery positioned to cover the beaches, machine gun nests built  into the coral ridges above the landing zones, and mortar positions registered on the most likely approach routes.

  The first day cost the Marines nearly 2,000 casualties, killed and wounded, the most expensive single day of amphibious fighting in the Pacific war to that point. Japanese counterattacks on the night of the first day, including a tank assault  that hit the Marine perimeter in darkness, added to the cost on both sides  and demonstrated that the garrison intended to contest every phase of the battle rather than simply conduct a terminal  defensive stand.

 By the end of the first week, the American forces had secured a substantial  beachhead and were pushing inland. But the terrain of Saipan,    limestone ridges, caves, dense vegetation, and the volcanic spine of the island running north to south  gave the Japanese defenders a series of natural defensive positions that each had to be taken individually at close  range against defenders who were not going to withdraw.

Lieutenant General Saito had ordered exactly the kind of defense that Kuribayashi would later refine on Iwo Jima. No beach defense,  no wasteful banzai charges in the opening phase, a fighting withdrawal designed to make every yard of advance cost the Americans something in blood.    The terrain cooperated.

 The island’s north-south ridge system, known as Mount Tapochau, and its surrounding heights provided the kind of layered defensive ground  that rewarded the defender and punished the attacker in exactly the way that Saito needed to make the battle last as long as possible and cost  as much as possible. The difference between Saipan and Iwo Jima was not the  doctrine.

 It was the terrain, the timeline, and the 25,000 civilians on the island who were about to become part of the battle in a way that had no precedent in the Pacific war and no solution in any military doctrine either side had developed. As the American advance pushed north through June and into July of 1944, Lieutenant General Saito understood with increasing clarity that organized resistance could not be maintained indefinitely.

 His supply situation was deteriorating.    His casualties had been severe. The defensive lines he was holding were contracting northward as American forces systematically cleared the southern and central portions of the island. He was communicating with Tokyo by radio  and Tokyo was telling him to hold, to fight to the last man, to make Saipan  cost the Americans enough that the invasion of the home islands would be politically impossible.

 What Saito communicated to his own officers in the final days of organized resistance was something different from a tactical assessment.    It was a statement of purpose. In his final orders, issued in the first days of July as American forces closed on the last Japanese defensive positions in the north of the island, Saito wrote that  every man who could hold a rifle should join the final attack, that there was to be no surrender, and that those who  could not fight should die by their own hand rather than fall into

American hands. He issued these orders to soldiers who had been fighting  for 3 weeks without meaningful resupply, who were wounded in numbers that would have rendered most military forces non-functional,  and who were facing an American force that had both numerical superiority and complete air and naval fire support.

 The orders were consistent with the Senjinkun, the Japanese military code that  defined surrender as a disgrace worse than death, and with everything the Japanese military culture had built into its men through training and doctrine. They were also, in the specific circumstances  of Saipan in July of 1944, an instruction to die in a particular way  for a strategic purpose that the men receiving the order could not fully have understood.

 Saito himself followed his own orders. He died by his own hand on July 6th,    1944, before the final banzai charge he had ordered was executed. On the morning of July 7th, 1944, approximately 4,000 Japanese soldiers, the  largest banzai charge of the entire Pacific War, moved south against the American lines in the final organized military action on Saipan.

  The men who participated in this charge were not, in most cases, soldiers  in any conventional operational sense by that point in the battle. They were the survivors of 3 weeks of grinding defensive combat,  men who were wounded, starving, largely out of ammunition, and many of them armed only with bayonets fixed to rifles that could no longer fire, or with  sharpened bamboo poles.

 They had been told to die fighting rather than surrender, and the charge was the form that dying fighting took  when there was no longer any tactical situation to manage, or any defensive position to hold. The American units that the charge hit, primarily Army battalions that had replaced Marine units in the northern  sector, were initially overwhelmed by the sheer volume of men moving through and past their positions.

 The charge penetrated American lines deeply enough to reach the positions of rear area units, including artillery crews, who fought with small arms and whatever was at hand against men  who had broken through the forward lines. The fighting lasted for several hours and  cost the Americans heavy casualties before reinforcing units sealed penetration and the last organized resistance collapsed.

When it was  over, approximately 4,000 Japanese soldiers were dead in a stretch of ground the Americans called Harakiri Gulch. The charge had accomplished nothing militarily that could change the outcome of the battle.    That was not why it had been ordered, or why the men who carried it out had done so.

   It had been ordered as the specific form of death that Japanese military culture had defined as honorable,  and the men who died in it had accepted that definition fully enough to walk into American fire  with weapons that could not hurt anyone. Stop and consider something that is not in most accounts of the Battle of Saipan.

 The soldiers who died in the Banzai charge on July 7th were combatants. They had been trained, however inadequately in the end, for the possibility of dying in battle. The 25,000 Japanese and Korean civilians on Saipan had not been trained for anything.  They were agricultural workers, teachers, merchants, children.

 They had come to Saipan in peacetime to build lives on an island that the Japanese government had been developing  as a civilian settlement for decades. And in the final days of the battle, as organized military resistance collapsed and American forces reached the northern cliffs of the island, somewhere  between 1,000 and 10,000 of those civilians, the exact number has never been established with certainty, jumped from  the cliffs into the ocean or onto the rocks below rather than surrender to American forces. They did

this because Japanese military and civilian authorities had told them for years that Americans were barbarians who would torture, rape, and murder any Japanese they captured. They did this  because the military commanders on the island had distributed grenades to civilian groups and told them to use those grenades on themselves rather than  be taken alive.

 They did this because the entire ideological framework of wartime Japanese nationalism had constructed the relationship between the Japanese people and the  enemy in terms that made death seem more rational than capture. American soldiers who watched it happen from a distance and tried to call out in Japanese through interpreters that surrender was safe, that no harm would come to them, were ignored, or not understood, or not believed.

 The cliffs of Saipan are called Banzai Cliff and Suicide Cliff in the postwar accounts. They are among the most documented mass civilian deaths in the Pacific War, and they are entirely the product of a government telling its people a lie about the enemy that those people believed completely enough to die rather than discover it was wrong.

Against the backdrop of the Banzai charge and the civilian deaths on the cliffs,  the approximately 1,000 Japanese soldiers and civilians who surrendered or were captured on Saipan represent a different story. One that the Japanese military command had specifically tried to prevent and that American intelligence was extremely interested in documenting.

 The prisoners  taken on Saipan came from a wider range of backgrounds than the garrison’s combat arms units. Some were support troops who had been cut off from their units in the chaotic final days. Some were wounded men who were physically incapable of the resistance their training  required.

 Some were men who had in the isolation and confu- -sion of the final days arrived at a private decision that the doctrine was wrong.  That dying on an island the war had already abandoned was not the service to Japan this engine couldn’t describe. None of these men surrendered easily  or without the specific kind of psychological crisis that the doctrine was designed to prevent.

 The cultural architecture that had produced the deaths on the cliffs operated on the prisoners,  too. What made them different from the men who died was not the absence of that architecture, but the specific circumstances of their capture. They were processed  through the Joint Intelligence Center Pacific Ocean Area, where trained interrogators who understood Japanese language and culture spent weeks in careful conversation with men who had just survived  an experience that virtually every aspect of their cultural

conditioning had told them would end in death or in something worse than  death. What the interrogators found in these conversations was a population of survivors whose experience of American captivity    immediately began dismantling the picture of Americans that Japanese propaganda had built.

 The interrogators were not brutal. The conditions of captivity were  not what the prisoners had been told to expect. Food was provided. Medical treatment was given to the wounded. The men who had expected to be killed or tortured found themselves alive and physically  cared for in circumstances that directly contradicted everything the official narrative had told them about what happened to Japanese who fell into American hands.

 The prisoner accounts of the civilian deaths on Saipan’s  northern cliffs produced some of the most disturbing testimony of the Pacific War. And the most disturbing element was not the deaths themselves,  but the specific chain of causation that the survivors described. The civilians who jumped from the cliffs had been told two  things with complete confidence by Japanese military and civilian authorities.

 First, that Americans routinely tortured and killed  Japanese prisoners rather than taking them captive in any meaningful sense. Second, that the Japanese military would return to Saipan and liberate any Japanese who survived the American occupation, but that anyone who had cooperated  with American forces or had been in American captivity would be treated as a traitor when that liberation came.

 Both of these claims were false. The prisoners who described them to American interrogators knew they were false because they were sitting in American captivity in conditions that contradicted  the first claim directly. And the second claim was rendered irrelevant by the strategic situation that had produced  Saipan’s fall in the first place.

 But the civilians on the cliffs had not yet had the opportunity to discover that the claims were  false. They had made their decisions on the basis of information that their government had provided in a cultural framework that their government had constructed over years of systematic propaganda.  And the decision to die rather than discover the truth was the product of that information and that framework operating together in a moment of absolute  crisis with no time for deliberation and no available

corrective.  The survivors who provided this testimony to American interrogators were largely matter-of-fact about it  in the way that people are matter-of- fact about things they cannot change and that they have already processed to whatever extent processing is possible. The fall of Saipan in July of 1944 produced a political earthquake in Tokyo  that had no precedent in the Pacific war.

 Within a month of the island’s fall, Prime Minister Hideki Tojo had resigned and the Japanese government had undergone a restructuring that, while it did not change the fundamental direction of the war, represented the first serious political consequence of the military situation  in the Pacific reaching the level of the Japanese civilian government.

 Tojo’s resignation was  directly caused by the loss of Saipan and by what that loss meant for the strategic position of the home islands. The men who replaced him  understood, as Tojo had understood, that the war was going badly. They also understood, as Tojo had, that acknowledging publicly  what they understood privately was politically and institutionally impossible.

  The Japanese public in July of 1944 was still being told that the Pacific  war was proceeding in a way consistent with ultimate Japanese victory. The civilians who had died on Saipan’s cliffs had believed this.  The soldiers who had died in the banzai charge had believed variations of it. The political system that  had produced these beliefs could not, without destroying itself, announce that the beliefs were wrong.

 So, it did not announce anything of the kind. It replaced Tojo with other men,  restructured the military command, and continued the war on the assumption that something  would change. That American losses in the coming battles for Peleliu and the Philippines and Iwo Jima and Okinawa  would break American political will.

That the home island defense would prove so costly that a negotiated peace would become  available. The thousand men who had surrendered on Saipan,  sitting in American captivity and describing to interrogators the difference between what they had been told and what they found,  represented the truth that the Japanese government could not afford to tell  and could not prevent those men from eventually telling.

 The Battle of Saipan decided more than the strategic question of B-29 range to Japan.  It decided the framework within which the final year of the Pacific War would be fought. And the decisions made in that framework  produced consequences that reached all the way to August of 1945. The Japanese military’s response to Saipan, maintaining the no surrender doctrine, intensifying the psychological preparation of both soldiers and civilians for death rather than capture, and escalating the use of kamikaze tactics that became formalized

doctrine in October of 1944, was the response of an institution that had concluded that changing the terms of the war was impossible and that the only available strategy was to make American victory  so costly that the terms of peace would be better than unconditional surrender. The American military’s response, and specifically to the civilian deaths on the cliffs and to the intelligence picture that the prisoners produced, was to begin planning for a home island invasion on the assumption that the Japanese

population had been conditioned to resist in exactly  the way that the civilians on Saipan had resisted and that the invasion  of Japan would produce civilian casualties on a scale that made Saipan look like a preliminary. The thousand who surrendered on Saipan had shown American planners the mechanism by which Japanese civilian resistance was  produced.

 Specific lies about American behavior delivered with institutional authority in a cultural framework that made death seem rational. Understanding the mechanism did not make the upcoming problem easier to solve.  It simply made it more clearly visible. The decisions made in response to that visibility, the atomic bombs, the Soviet  declaration of war against Japan, the surrender that followed, were all downstream of what Saipan had shown both sides about the nature of the war they were fighting and about how it could end. 30,000 Japanese soldiers

defended  Saipan. Fewer than 1,000 chose to surrender. The rest died on the island, died in the charge, or died on the cliffs. The thousand who surrendered sat in American captivity and described to men with notebooks the difference between  what they had been told and what they found. That difference was the truth of Saipan.

 The government that produced the deaths on the cliffs  understood the difference perfectly. It was the people who died who did not get to find out. If this video meant something to you,  hit the like button right now. It is the single best way to push this story to someone who needs to hear it.

 Subscribe if you are not already here. Drop a comment telling us where you are watching from and whether anyone in your family served in the Pacific. We will see you  in the next one.