Why Navy SEALs Wore Rolex Watches in Vietnam

 

 

  Picture a Navy SEAL wading through the Mekong Delta in 1968. Grease paint on his face, a rifle across his chest, and on his wrist, a Rolex Submariner. The story goes that he wore it for one reason. If he was ever captured or trapped behind enemy lines, he could slip it off his wrist and trade it for a boat, for a bride, for a way home.

Trade the Rolex, the legend says,  and you could buy back your own life. It is one of the most repeated stories in military history. You will hear it on every watch forum,    in a hundred YouTube videos, at reunions over beers, and almost none of it holds up. Because the watch that actually went to war with the frogmen of Vietnam, the one the Navy handed them before they shipped out,  usually was not a Rolex at all.

Coronado, California. The early 1960s. To understand the watch, you have to understand the men who wore it, and the work they did. The SEALs were brand new. President Kennedy stood up the first two SEAL teams in January of 1962, but their bloodline ran straight back to the underwater demolition teams, the frogmen, who since World War II had swum ahead of every amphibious landing to blow up obstacles and chart the beach.

Their whole world ran on time. On a combat swim, a watch was not decoration. It was a navigation instrument. A diver knew his kick speed. He knew his compass heading. And the minutes ticking around  the bezel told him how far he had traveled through black water, where he could not see his own hands in front of his face.

Get that timing wrong and you surfaced in the wrong spot. Maybe a mile from the boat that was supposed to pull you out. Maybe directly under an enemy position. On a night swim into a river mouth, the watch on your wrist was sometimes the only thing standing between a clean approach and a disaster. You could not see landmarks.

 You could not risk a light. All you had was your heading, your kick count, and the minutes crawling around that bezel. And remember when this was happening, decades before the dive computer, there was no little screen on your wrist doing the math for you. So, a rugged mechanical dive watch sealed against water pressure with a rotating bezel to mark elapsed minutes and a glowing dial you could read in total darkness was not a luxury.

It was survival equipment, the same as your fins or your rebreather. Which is why the Navy did something that sounds almost unbelievable today. To equip these swimmers, it went out and bought them some of the best dive watches on the planet. But, here’s the detail everyone gets wrong about which watch that was.

The watch the Navy issued to its frogmen was a Submariner, but it was not the Rolex Submariner. It was a Tudor. Reference 7928. And most people have never even heard the name. So, what was Tudor? It was Rolex’s own budget brand founded by the same man, Hans Wilsdorf, who built Rolex. Think of it as the Chevrolet to Rolex’s Cadillac.

Same rugged waterproof case, the same look, often the same handset, but with a cheaper movement inside and a far cheaper price on the tag. And for a Navy supply officer, that was the whole point. Think about that for a second. You are buying watches by the crate    for men who are going to smash them against boat hulls and drag them through mud and coral.

   Why on earth would you issue a Rolex when the Tudor next to it does the exact  same job for a fraction of the money? So, that is what they did.    According to Tudor’s own records, the company was shipping Submariners from its New York office to the US Navy as early as 1958 and kept shipping them straight through the Vietnam War.

During training, the watches were handed out on the grinder in Coronado. And there was a small, almost tribal detail to it.    Black dials went to the enlisted men. Blue dials went to the officers. Men like  Lieutenant Philip Moki Martin of SEAL Team One carried these watches into the swamps.

Martin’s own issued 7928 survives today in the Navy SEAL Museum. Still on its original fabric strap, complete with a little leather cover that snapped over the dial to hide the glow of the luminous  paint from any enemy watching the tree line at night. He was not  alone. Captain Norman Olsen, who commanded Underwater Demolition Team 11, carried a Tudor Submariner, too, and donated it before he died.

But there is a  sad footnote to all of this. When the war was over and the Navy moved on to cheaper watches, huge numbers of these issued Tudors  were simply destroyed or dumped at government auction for scrap money. The survivors became something else entirely, a keepsake, a quiet  mark of old guard status inside the SEAL community, proof you were there when the teams were young.

And you do not have to take my word for any of this. A man who lived it will  tell you himself.  First time I was issued a watch was a uh Tudor. It was  a UDT 21. Just before we deployed on that Caribbean deployment. So, everybody had to have a watch because you were doing pre-invasion reconnaissance.

 The H hour on D-Day was at a very specific point, and everybody’s watches had to be exactly coordinated in order to make that a success. Otherwise, the things  could go too early or too late, and then the invasion would be in peril.  So, if the Tudor was the watch the Navy actually handed them, where did the Rolex come from? Because Rolexes absolutely were there.

That part of the story is real. The Rolexes on those wrists were not issued. For the most part, the men bought them themselves with their own money. And back then, they could actually afford to. And the prices back then are almost hard to believe now. On a US base at the post exchange, a Rolex was sold tax-free.

In the late 1960s, a Submariner ran a few hundred dollars. One SEAL remembered buying his brand new at the base for about $105. A GMT-Master could be had for well under 200. These were not the untouchable status symbols they are now. They were a good tool watch that a working sailor could save up for. And they wore them in a way that would make a modern collector wince.

Many frogmen mounted their Submariners on a chunky handmade metal cuff called an Olongapo band, hammered out by artisans in the town of Olongapo, right outside the huge American naval base at Subic Bay in the Philippines. Servicemen would bring the watch, pick out their unit insignia, and walk out with something that was half time piece, half trench art.

So, why buy the Rolex at all if the Navy already gave you a perfectly good Tudor? Two reasons, and neither of them is the one the legend wants you to believe. First, it was simply a better version of a tool they already trusted. Same job,  nicer watch. Second, and this is the real answer, it was tribe. It was a rite of passage.

Buying the Submariner was how a young frogman marked himself as one of the team. Part of a line that stretched back to the men who cleared the beaches before him. That badge never wore off, either. Walk into a reunion of Vietnam era SEALs today, decades later, and you will find one of the most concentrated collections of Rolex Submariners    anywhere on Earth.

 Worn on old, scarred wrists that earned them. The watch outlasted the war. For a lot of these men, it became the war. A small steel record of the years that made them. A tool and a badge. That is the honest reason a Rolex ended up on a SEAL’s wrist in Vietnam. Which brings us, finally, to the legend itself. The trade-it-for-your-life story.

   Where did that come from? And is any of it true? The version you have heard is not the full picture. The legend is simple and irresistible. A downed pilot, a trapped operator deep in hostile territory. He offers a local his gold Rolex,  and in return he gets shelter, or a ride, or passage across a border.

The watch buys his freedom. And the frustrating part  is that there is a real seed of truth buried in it, which is exactly why the myth refuses  to die. The US military genuinely did issue escape and evasion barter kits, going all the way back to World War II and on through Korea  and Vietnam.

If you were shot down, the idea was you had valuables you could trade with locals to get home. So, the concept of a barter watch is not made up. But, look at what was actually inside those kits. A couple of gold rings, a gold chain and pendant, and a watch. But, not a Rolex. The watch in the government barter kit was a cheap, no-name piece.

In one documented Navy kit, it was a Miles Snow Star on a cloth  strap. The military was not sealing thousand-dollar Swiss dive watches  into rubber pouches to give away. It used something disposable. So, the barter kit was real. The barter Rolex was not. People thought they had the full picture. They did not.

And when you actually go looking for  a confirmed case of an operator trading his Rolex to escape a war, you come up empty. The people who have spent years documenting this, including a former CIA  case officer who ran the Watches of Espionage project, have chased the story for a  long time and never nailed down a single verified example.

Every trail ends the same way. A guy who knew a guy. A tale told over beers. Never a name. Never a date you can check. There is one famous case where a Rolex  and a shoot down actually collided, and it is worth telling because it turns the myth completely on its head. In June of 1995, Air Force Captain Scott O’Grady was flying over Bosnia when a surface-to-air missile blew his F-16 out of the sky.

He spent six days on the ground evading capture before Marines pulled  him out. And on his wrist the whole time was a Rolex GMT-Master, a gift  from his father. And he never once thought about trading it. He later said that if he had been captured, the watch would have been  gone in a heartbeat.

 Just a souvenir for whoever caught him. For O’Grady, the Rolex was not a bargaining chip. It was a reason to get home. So, the single most famous Rolex in a survival situation story  is a man who was absolutely determined not to give his up. Quick one before we go on. If you would rather get the checked version of these stories than  the campfire version, that is the whole reason this channel exists.

 So, consider subscribing. Because the next part    is where we answer the question that has been sitting under this whole video. If the Rolex was bought and the Tudor was issued, then what did the US military actually pick when it wanted a purpose-built dive watch of its own? By the mid-1960s, the US government had a problem with all these Swiss watches.

They worked beautifully,  but they were foreign-made, and the military preferred, when it could, to issue American-specified gear it fully controlled. So, the actual purpose-built US military dive watch of the era was not a Rolex, and it was not even really a Tudor. It was a watch most people have never heard of, with one of the strangest names in horology, the Tornek-Rayville TR-900.

And there is a clever little trick hiding inside that name. The TR-900 was really a Blancpain Fifty Fathoms, one of the very first modern dive watches ever made,  quietly rebadged so it could satisfy American    to US special forces in Vietnam. Same watch, patriotic paint job. And as the war went on, the Navy kept doing what any budget-minded organization does.

 It hunted for cheaper. The expensive Swiss Tudors slowly  gave way. By the mid-1970s, the military was moving toward a rugged, no-nonsense watch from Japan, the Seiko 6309, the chunky diver that collectors  now call the turtle. It became the last mechanical watch to be standard issued to the SEAL teams before the whole world went digital.

And by 1983, the romance was basically over. The SEALs officially moved to cheap, tough, battery-powered  digital watches. The Rolex and the Tudor and the Blancpain in disguise all quietly retired from active  duty. But the story those old watches told did not retire with them. If anything, it got louder.

And that is the last piece  of this puzzle. So, how did we end up here? How did the Rolex, the watch most of them bought for themselves, become the whole story? While the Tudor that the Navy actually issued got  almost completely forgotten? Part of it is simple. Rolex is a legend and Tudor, for decades, was the quiet sibling nobody talked about.

The story is always going to reach for the famous name. The SEALs wore Rolexes is a better line  than the SEALs were issued mid-price Tudors and bought Rolexes at the base store. One of those gets repeated forever.  And part of it is Hollywood. The same year the SEALs were founded,  1962, James Bond strapped on a Rolex Submariner in Dr. No.

  And the idea of the tough guy with the expensive dive watch was burned into the culture  forever. Real frogmen and fictional spies started wearing the same watch. And after a while, nobody could tell the marketing from the history anymore. And part of it is money. Those cheap post exchange Submariners that sold for a hundred odd dollars, a genuine combat  carried example now sells at auction for six figures.

The moment these watches became treasure, the legend around them got polished up to match. The wild part is that the tradition never really died. Plenty of modern SEALs still save up for a Submariner as a personal right of passage, honoring the frogmen  who came before. One SEAL Team Six operator, Will Chesney, even wore his Rolex Submariner on the 2011 raid that killed Osama bin Laden, figuring that if he was not  coming back, he would go out wearing it.

So, go back to where we started. That SEAL in the Mekong Delta, grease painted, rifle up, watch on his wrist. The watch was probably real. It just probably was not a Rolex, and it definitely was not there so he could trade it for his life. It was there to tell him how far he had  swum in the dark, and to remind him whose team he was on.

The truth was never as dramatic as the legend, but it is a better story because it is about the men, not the watch. If you want to see the man himself, the full interview with Captain Rick Woolard is linked below. And if you have got a war story you have always wondered about, drop it in the comments.

 We will check the next one for you.

 

Disclaimer: This story is fictional and created for entertainment purposes only. Any names, characters, places, or events are fictitious or used fictitiously. No real person or organization is intended to be portrayed.

Recommended for You

View Archive arrow_forward